 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicolae Sirius (Japan)
Old and new converge to the same principle Homo Sapiens used the compass, protractor and the ruler to make very complex geometrical designs. They had knowledge of the Solar
Cycle, and were familiar with what (in the Indian and Tibetan religious philosophy) is called the 'body of light' and 'chakras'. They recorded these knowledge on artifacts. One of
these artifacts, that for some reasons is the most representative proof for this recording, laid in the bowels of the Earth for approximately 26.000 years until 1981 when archeologist
Vasile Chirica brought it to light. This artifact, called the "Amulet from Mitoc" --bearing the name of the place where it was discovered-- has been researched ever since.
Its own discoverer, Vasile Chirica, in his work "The Gravettian in the East of the Romanian Carpatians" (Yassy, 1989) described it as an anthropomorphism. Some years later, Andrei
Vartic, in his book "A question with regard to
Paleoinformatique"
wrote that "The amulet from Mitoc is possibly, the first calculator of the Homo Sapiens".
The Amulet from Mitoc, from ARCHEOLOGIA, nr. 353, fevrier 1999, France, p. 63
The difference of these comparisons, concerning the same matter, are very big. And when two
specialists have such divided opinions, it means that there is something unique that exalts or restrains
them to make such opposing statements. If an incredible small artifact, as the Amulet of Mitoc is, is to
be compared with a calculator, then for sure that would mean that the artifact is meant to have an inner structure on which the information were recorded.
As a matter of fact the amulet is, just a 4 cm piece of bone. A modern electronic device, of the same
size, might be able to perform quite a few operations as long as the energy supply lasts. But if the
amulet has been "loaded" with the Primordial language and numerology, then there would be no other object that could challenge its operational diversity.
Admitting that this is the case, then the explanation of the inner workings of the ontological language
becomes necessary. And this is because the primordial language is not only the tuning principle of the
self, or the spring of all languages. This unique language can extend from the simple representation of the numbers 1,2,3... to the basic principles of the family of elements in the universe. One might think that this sounds like a story, or that if such a large amount of information was confined
on such a small artifact, how then could the information of the remote past be nothing but similar to our knowledge.
A good example, though not the only one, is the beginning of the narrative of all major religions. These
religions made it clear that "at the beginning was the word" and continued the development of the narrative by placing a symbolical accent on the numbers too.
In the Kaballa, on the other hand, numbers are the representation of words. This is nothing out of
ordinary. It is just one of the many ways of working with numbers. Though it should not be believed that numbers have power within themselves.
2 The hidden knowledge of the remote past
The Amulet of Mitoc, face a) and b)
  1) The composition of the amulet Face A
a) a spiral
b) nine lines on the right part of the object, separated in a way by an angle that is oriented towards them
c) three lines in the upper-left part, bordered by two lines that resemble an angle, though not connected
d) six lines in the lower-left section, separated by an angle
e) a line in between the three angles, just touching the angle oriented towards the nine lines. Face B
A choreography of lines. Groups of two and three lines that show a movement from the upper left of the artifact to the right. 3 The logic behind the apparent simplicity
When we deal with something that is beautiful, something that catches our eye, it is the first
impression that, generally, counts the most. And this impression might haunt us for a while. A second
judgement, on the same thing, may change or deepen our initial impression. Yet, this is not the case
with the Amulet of Mitoc. As soon as we deepen our re-search under its surface, we realize that its simplicity was the result of a very sophisticated calculation.
On face A of the artifact there are lines that appear as though being not properly curved. Other lines look
shorter than they should be, for the composition of the object. While some of these lines might give is
the impression, that they were incompletely drawn. In reality, though, there is nothing of the sort.
For example, the first three lines in the upper-left part, appear to be drawn asymmetrically. But a single
arc of a circle that intersects all these three lines would simply show that their position was geometrically calculated. And here is the first example of the hidden symmetry:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1
The arc of the circle drawn from the
left, enters through one of the signs marked on the margin of the amulet, it traverses along one side of the angle that is oriented towards the nine lines, , enters through the space
that separates the two lines that resemble an angle ("the broken angle" we might call it...) and then it touches the first of the three lines at its base, it segments the
second line at 1/3 and crosses the third line at exactly 1/2, ... Then, it touches the edge of the spiral and exits through another point marked on the margin of the
artifact.The three lines crossed (by the arc of the circle), appear as not being equal in size but in reality they are all 9 mm.
|
|
|
|
Figure 2 The small space, which separates the
broken angle
and delimits the upper three lines, is of a great importance. If two lines are drawn through this hole, they, as it can be seen in this image, divide the composition of the artifact into three parts. Now we can understand that the three angles (that indicate that they delimitate the three sets of numbers---3,6, and 9--) might have other roles.
|
|
|
|
Figure 3
Two more lines (A-B and A-C ) drawn from the centre (or the base) of
the spiral, tangential on the lines 8 and 9 of the 9 line set, and the last line of the six line set, from the base of the line B to the centre (or the base) of the spiral,
divide the space of the artifact into four sections of 19 mm each. From F to the middle of the artifact there is another 19 mm. And from there to B there is another 19 mm.
Therefore the composition of the artifact had a very precise geometrical and mathematical significance. This was before any of the 3, 6 and 9 lines (that are the symbolical
representation of the Threefold world, the Primordial language, and the Self) were drawn. |
|
|
|
Figure 4. The spiral plays a central role in the
representation of all lines and dots that are part of the design of this artifact. It is the representation of 0 primordial. The inner connection between the absolute
power and the primordial words in this design, is represented by the correlation of the spiral through the broken angle with the six lines. Homo sapiens
made this representation of the six ontological words based on the audible bits of any single word in part. The image of these lines passing through the broken angle
brings to mind the blind spot of the eye that just allow the light that has passed the iris, to speed farther to the optic nerve. |
|
|
Figure 5
The left side of the angle that separates the six lines is connected with the
nine lines. They are connected by an arc of a circle. |
|
|
Figure 6 A circle with the radius
of 19 mm. It connects 19 points indicated on the artifact. Number 19 is used in many operations, especially for measurement and time. Here it refers to the solar cycle. |
|
|
Figure 7From the points indicated on the right
side, there were drawn five arcs of circle, which join together exactly on the line that separates the three angles. The symbolism of this line is that it passes through... or takes a
new coordinate and exits the circle, though the arcs of circle appear to force it back. |
|
|
Figure 8From left to right, using the same
measure of the arc of the circle, there are drawn five lines. The places shown for drawings are indicated in the left part... from the first line on the bottom, up to line number five
of the six lines. These five lines join line number five, that is, exactly on the opposite side of the line that separates the three triangles, which is the five lines
from the first line up. Here, the importance and the subtlety of number five become obvious. |
|
|
Figure 9 The symbol known up to date, and
considered to have roots in Babylon. There are 19 mm from the middle of the spiral to the line that separates the composition of the ontological words. |
|
|
Figure 10 This is not the last image. It is only
one of the many geometrical designs inscribed on this amulet. Nevertheless, this is a very conclusive work. Because from here it is documented a work on cosmogony. |
|
|
|
|
4. Diversities within the changes made from the primordial language Out of the
primordial language and numerology, most known religions made their case. Nevertheless, with the passing of time and with the diversification of religions (by adding to the old or changing into
the substance of the previous) the significant distortion of the primordial language became eloquent. If we take, as an example, the word 'OM', which is the most revered
word in the Indian religious tradition, we could simply note that the differences concerning its meaning are indeed too many. Though the diversity of these meanings might add color to the
substance of the word, a real convergence to the logical core of the word shows that some definitions are atributed to it, are, in reality, like the other side of the ocean, which, due to its
vast size, are isolated from view. The new researchers into the reality of the "mystic sound of the renown syllable OM" (besides the acceptance of the well known
definitions in which OM is described as Brahman, Shiva, the sound of the Sun, or the sound of the light) try to make projection into the states of the mind. They also stage ways to create
and perform by way of imagination to acquire "good results" as they are explained in Kala Hamsa (The Bird). Here, AUM/OM is described as "A, the right wing of the bird,
U, its left wing, M, its tail". In the Manduka Upanishad, the four elements of "OM" (viewed as AUM) are explained as an allegory.. "And the ancients say
-- wrote David Gordon in his A-U-M Silence-- that the audible sound which most resembles this unstruck sound is the syllable OM. Tradition has it that this ancient mantra is composed of
four elements: the first three are vocal sounds: A, U, M. The fourth sound, unheard, is the silence which begins and ends the audible sound, the silence which surrounds it."
The description of the "unstruck sound" and of the "the silence that surrounds it" --an allegorical correspondent to the letters AUM and the enveloping silence, it is
just a symbol of one of the patterns used by the Divine when He utters the primordial language. In the ancient tradition of many other cultures, this representation is similar
to the Three-dimensional world that begins and ends within the fundamental concept of the Creator. When one says that OM is a soundless word, the reference doesn't even come close
to the primordial language. Since the primordial language is an audible language, numerology is calculated on its sonorous parts. It looks like the letters "OM", and letters
"RA" which had the meaning of Light or Sun and became the name of the Egyptian sun of god (RA), have a very different source. If they are part of the word that appears from one side to
the other of the Nature of Mind in the enlightened state of Bardo, then the meaning of the soundless OM is there. But these letters have nothing in common with the primordial language. As it is well known, the Egyptian sun of god, RA, took over the attributes and the names of the previous gods and became the Father of Gods. One of those names that was replaced by
RA was RE. In this situation too, the new covered the old. This means that an ontological word was replaced by a segment of the word viewed in the state of Bardo. Only that the story of RA didn't
end there. The Tibetan Book of the Dead has a beautiful explanation on this account: "This male cat is RA, and he was called 'MAU' because of the speech of the Sa, who said concerning him:
He is like (mau) who that which he hath made; therefore, did the name of RA became 'MAU'" This syllable SA is part of the Indian religious philosophy too. It was described to
mean the first indestructible sound. This sound, as the religious philosophy describes it, turns into Ri that is followed by Ga, Ma, Pa, Da, and Ni. In much the same way the syllable OM is used.
Of which, is it said, it meant to substitute the Divine word Shabda. Different sources, in relation to the same matter, mention that the word NA is the core of
the Vedas and it is considered the God Shiva. In NAMAH Shivaya (Agama and Veda) which "represents all mantras and tantras" how is presented in "What is the Holy Namah Sivaya
Mantra?" NA is the God Shiva but, as well, NA symbolizes the Earth. In Tara-Sara Upanishad is stated that from the word NA come Vishnu, Baghavad (Lord) and Ishvara. In Tantric principles it
is mentioned that OM is the progenitor sound of all big mantras,. and that Naada is sound. On the other hand, Brahmavadhis, of which it has been said that they are men of transcendental wisdom,
claim that kama-bija-mantra 'Klim' and the monosyllable 'OM' are in no way different. The sounds of the words NA, SA, and AUM/OM/Klim are to mean the primordial word. In
Gayatri/OM mantra is written that " OM is present in Krishna nama and Krishna nama is present in OM". This interpretation is similar to the Biblical statement in which God is described
as being with the Word and the Word was God. The reality is that the first Primordial word is NA. This word in many cases was written as NAM. This change was made, I suppose,
because the first letter of the second ontological word begins with M. The reverted form of NA as AN was part of the Sumerian tradition where AN means sky. If from Up to Down the first word came
as NA, it was probably thought by the Sumerians, AN was the way to utter it to the sky. Yet, in many other languages it carries the meaning of passing of time. The logic
of this stays exactly in the meaning of the reversible arrangement of the primordial sound of these letters. In the same way, I believe, NAM becomes MAN. 5 A simple conclusion
If it is not possible to rediscover the Primordial/ontological language, the Divine Himself concealed and has been working with --a language that is inherited in all human souls--, it means
that old and new are unrelated and that life itself is random. If that is so, the philosopher Emil Cioran was right when he said: "Had Noah foreseen the future he, with his own hands,
would have sunk his Ark". Though, the humorous part of this saying, ultimately turns to reflect the philosopher's concern to our way of life. Something that probably haunted him that he so
emphatically (in his fine work The Temptation to Exist) wrote:
"Those who cannot benefit from their possibilities of nonexistence are strangers to themselves: puppets, objects 'furnished' with a self, numbed by a neutral time
that is neither duration nor eternity."
Yet, the skeptics, or those that ask for a proof for what is meant to be the invisible roots of existence, are right too. And this is because all major religions, which describe in one way or
another what has been considered to be the wonder of life, reveal that they had access to the primordial/ontological language and numerology, but the way this was depicted in their works has no
constancy or varies too much. Or would be this the case because the fundamental description of Ultimate Reality made by those that had access to it, fell in the hands of mystics and
occultists that distorted it? This not being the case, then, it would not be possible to have in major religions (that have based their prayers on the words that are considered to be the Divine's
name) the sound or the written form of these words in exactly the opposite way that they are in the Primordial language. In the Kaballa, for example, it is mentioned that
the creation arises from the divine letter JOD and from the second-self, the word IHVH". While King Soboka was convinced that "The language is Toth, the Divine, whose power is greater
of all the other gods" as mentioned in the Enuma Elish. TAU/DAO was the old name of God in China. Kami is the God of theAinu peoples in Japan. And it is said that words like
Amin, Amen, etc are similar to AUM or OM, the sound of God. The Greeks, named the Word Logos, and to them it was the only rational principle that governed and developed the universe. And that,
for sure, was a big headache to Pythagoras, who was convinced that the universe is based on a numerological order. Therefore the greater the variety of words that are meant
to express the Principle, the harder to find the truth behind them. And this bears a huge significance. It was John Brzvoski, who on the significance of words, in his work
The Key to the Art of Tibet, made the following statement:
"Different mantras, AUM HRI HA HA HRIM HUN PHAT or AUM MANI PADME HUM, would give different results. A primordial psycho-physical
entity, sometimes called a god, would be invoked. But in truth none were called, none arrived. It was the meditator himself who would become, or reveal, that aspect of
himself. He reached an activated radiant body system which thought and felt in the manner of "god" or "bodhisattva" as the case may have been
."
Based on a research in the field of genetics, Luigi Luca Sforza, Professor Emeritus at Stanford University, California, concluded that:
These aspects, concerning the meaning, power, and the coded message written in our genes might give us a warning. And this is because the Primordial language is not just a handful of words
that could be turned into a mandala. As it is not just a handful of words from which the ontological numerology is calculated. These words, ultimately, are a concept in what regards the family of
elements in the universe. One might call this concept Creation. Well, it is not. Giving a name to the substratum of the reality of universe and making it dependent on the power of the words
that correlates to anything that comes into being, doesn't necessarily mean exactly that. Without the power of these words, which are called the Law/ or the laws of the universe, the Self could
not "navigate" without meeting obstacles that diminishes its energy. It is for this reason that we can not recognize our own Divine nature.
6 The six primordial words NA MYO HO RE NGHE KIO
The last great sage who claimed and fought to his death to assure
people that these are the Primordial words was Nichiren Daishonin (1222-1282) of Japan. In the transliteration from the Japanese language the reading is NAM-MYO-HO-REN-GE-KYO or
NAMMYO HO RENGE KIO And here there are few things that should be taken into consideration. The words (NA) NAM and (RE) REN were part of a great tradition in the Indian and Chinese religious
philosophy. As it is known, Buddhism moved from India to China and from there to Korea and Japan. Nichiren could not go farther as to say that there were mistakes in Shakyamuni Buddha's
work. Though China received the teaching directly from India, they readjusted the ontological words to their own phonemics. In this way the Primordial words in Chinese were read as MIAO -FA
-LIEN- HUA- CHING. This means that they started the reading from MYO, the second ontological word. Nichiren adjusted the correctness of the sound to the phonemic of the words in use.
There is a distinction between NA and NAM and between RE and REN. This needs further explanation. If we speak only of sound, then there should not be much debate
about. But if we need to demonstrate the structure of the ontological numerology, then we need to be moe specific. To be continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2004 \ contact webmaster |
|
|
|
|
|
